Skip to main content
· 8/26/2003

Thomas P. Loftis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. David Cole, Kenneth Adkins

Citations

  • 342 F.3d 509
  • 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2079
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17744
  • 2003 WL 22004883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts may remand a case under the rule of unanimity only if the plaintiff timely filed a motion to remand
  • finding that remand was warranted where the parties seeking removal did not meet all the requirements of § 1446
  • “Generally, a state law claim cannot be ‘recharacterize[d]’ as a federal claim for the purpose of removal.” (quoting Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 64 (1987))
  • defects in subject- matter jurisdiction may be raised sua sponte and at any time
  • “Failure to obtain unanimous consent forecloses the opportunity for removal under Section 1446.”
  • defects in subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised sua sponte and at any time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Clay, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.