Thomas P. Davis and Cathy M. Davis v. G.N. Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying additional discovery where plaintiff had failed to explain why ample time plaintiff already had to conduct discovery and demand compliance with unmet requests was insufficient
• holding the plaintiffs failed to set forth any specific evidence that might have been obtained from further discovery, which would create a genuine issue as to a material fact
• explaining that where a substantial transaction subject to numerous terms and conditions is at issue, the non-drafting party should take measures to ensure her understanding of all material terms and conditions
• affirming denial of 56(d) motion when plaintiffs' request was \based on nothing more than mere speculation\
• affirming summary judg- ment for defendants on claims that mortgage terms were not made sufficiently clear
• affirming denial of 56(d) motion when plaintiffs’ request was “based on nothing more than mere speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).