Thomas M. Rettig Eva O. Rettig, Cross-Appellants v. Kent City School District, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a student is unable to benefit educationally from extracurricular activity, the school district is not required under the IDEA to provide such a service to the student in his IEP
• “[T]he applicable test under Rowley is whether the [] child’s IEP, when taken in its entirety, is reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits.”
• “Article III grants the federal courts jurisdiction over cases and controversies.”
• \Article III grants the federal courts jurisdiction over cases and controversies.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).