THOMAS M. DUKES, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the Board found that there was “no sufficient objective basis” for finding that employees viewed a statement as a threat, § 158(c
• “The coincidence of the two separate violations during the same organizing campaign does not of itself create a close factual relationship”
• “The coincidence of the two separate violations during the same organizing campaign does not of itself create a close factual relationship”
• “The NLRB has long construed section 10(b), with judicial approval, to permit prosecution of an alleged violation that was not timely charged if it is ‘closely related’ to the allegations in a timely filed charge”
• “The NLRB has long construed section 10(b), with judicial approval, to permit prosecution of an alleged violation that was not timely charged if it is ‘closely related’ to the allegations in a timely filed charge”
• same employee, different supervisor, no factual relatedness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).