Thomas Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate actual innocence, the question of whether the Constitution requires an \actual innocence\ exception to AEDPA's statute of limitations need not be reached
• holding that the “AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations leaves habeas petitioners with some reasonable opportunity to have their claims heard on the merits”
• holding that a certificate of appealability issued by a district court is “presumptively valid and may not be challenged as improvidently granted”
• holding that a certificate of appealability issued by a district court is “presumptively valid and may not be challenged as improvidently granted”
• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate actual innocence, the question of whether the Constitution requires an “actual innocence” exception to AEDPA’s statute of limitations need not be reached
• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate actual innocence, the question of whether the Constitution requires an \actual innocence\ exception to AEDPA's statute of limitations need not be reached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).