Skip to main content
· 6/17/2024

THOMAS LAWHORNE, III v. AMY E. DOUGLAS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming sanction of dismissal and observing that “untimely discovery responses served after the service of a motion seeking sanctions on this basis can support sanctions” (citation omitted)
  • plaintiff did not object to discovery requests and failed to respond within extended time to comply
  • plaintiff did not object to discovery requests and failed to respond within extended time to comply
  • trial court must consider less severe sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.