Thomas Larimer v. International Business MacHines Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he right to an accommodation, being limited to disabled employees, does not extend to a nondisabled associate of a disabled person.”
• distraction inapplicable where there “was no evidence that [Plaintiff] was absent or distracted at work because of his [relative’s disabilities].”
• using an employee’s sexual partner’s HIV diagnosis as an example

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).