Thomas JACKSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although claimant could no longer perform his specific job, he could return to occupation as generally performed (emphasis in original)
• holding that “a claimant must demonstrate an inability to return to the previous type of work he was engaged in”
• stating that where remand is required, it may be unnecessary to review other issues raised
• stating that where is remand is required, it may be unnecessary to review other issues raised
• stating that where remand is required, it may be unnecessary to review other issues raised
• stating that where remand is required, it may be unnecessary to review other issues raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).