Thomas J. Frisby v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the affiant is at the scene, the warrant is validly approved and the search is confined to the approved corners of the warrant, the search is valid despite the absence of the affidavit
• noting that there was “no allegation that the failure to serve plaintiff with a copy of Attachment A was either intentional or deliberate”
• noting that there was “no allegation that the failure to serve plaintiff with a copy of Attachment A was either intentional or deliberate”
• finding that a search was valid despite the officer violating a federal rule that required him to provide the person whose premise was being searched a copy of the warrant
• “failure to furnish him with Attachment A prior to the search” was a violation of Rule 41(d)
• “The Fourth Amendment does not necessarily require that government agents serve a warrant, or an attachment thereto, prior to initiating a search or seizing property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).