Skip to main content
· 5/25/2016

Thomas Hearrean v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Johnson 's reasoning regarding residual clause of ACCA did not clearly apply to § 924(c)(3)(B) and noting Johnson did not clearly invalidate § 924(c)(3)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.