Thomas G. Parry Bh-2648 v. Frederick Rosemeyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that direct consequence “is one that has a definite, immediate and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendant’s punishment” (quotation omitted)
• noting no duty to inform of collateral consequences, even those that are serious and foreseeable
• finding no prejudice where, among other things, “[t]he record [did] not substantiate that Parry was reluctant to plead guilty....”
• denying an IAC claim in part because “[c]ounsel did not affirmatively mislead [the petitioner] with respect to the consequences of revocation of probation; the subject simply never came up”
• “sentencing judge was not constitutionally required to explain in detail the potential effects of probation, including that if it is violated, a prison sentence . . . can be imposed”
• sentence imposed following revocation of probation is a collateral consequence that did not render plea involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).