Skip to main content
· 11/14/1962

Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Wade

Citations

  • 361 S.W.2d 671
  • 1962 Mo. LEXIS 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unless there is a specific objection to evidence which contains proper ground for its exclusion, nothing is preserved for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stockard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.