Thomas Ex Rel. A.T. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that no compensatory education is required for a denial of FAPE if the student would not benefit from the additional services
• observing that “it may be conceivable that no compensatory education is required for the denial of FAPE”
• acknowledging that \[i]t may be conceivable that no compensatory education is required for the denial of FAPE\ because a student has \flourished in his current placement\
• without new evidence, “a motion for summary judgment operates as a motion for judgment based on the evidence comprising the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).