Thomas E. DIXON, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an impairment is not disabling where the claimant “worked with his impairments over a period of years without any worsening of his condition”
• “Dixon worked with his impairments over a period of years without any worsening of his condition. Thus, he cannot claim them as disabling.”
• “[The claimant] worked with his impairments over a period of years without any worsening of his condition. Thus, he cannot claim them as disabling.”
• “If an ALJ explicitly discredits a claimant’s testimony and gives a good reason for doing so, we will normally defer to that judgment.”
• if ALJ explicitly discredits claimant's testimony and gives good reason for doing so, court normally defers to ALJ's judgment
• if ALJ explicitly discredits claimant&s testimony and gives good reason for doing so, this court normally defers to ALJ&s judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).