Thomas D. Boles v. Greeneville Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing district court’s judgment in favor of local housing authority and holding that HUD was indispensable party because plaintiffs challenges to a housing project that HUD approved constituted an “indirect[] attack” on HUD’s administrative decision
• “[a]ny hardship suffered . . is attributable to their own failure to bring [an interested person] into the case as a party”
• HUD a necessary party when the legality of its actions is at issue
• HUD a necessary party when legality of its actions is at issue
• raising the issue sua sponte on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).