· 5/29/2003
Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of Forestry
Citations
- 69 P.3d 1238
- 188 Or. App. 10
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
- noting that the preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
- rejecting argument for remand based on unexplained inconsistency with prior agency practice where the agency did provide an explanation for its different action
- rejecting argument for remand based on unexplained inconsistency with prior agency practice where the agency did provide an explanation for its different action
- preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
- “In construing an administrative rule, we apply the same analytical framework applicable to the construction of statutes ***”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.