Skip to main content
· 5/29/2003

Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of Forestry

Citations

  • 69 P.3d 1238
  • 188 Or. App. 10
  • 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
  • noting that the preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
  • rejecting argument for remand based on unexplained inconsistency with prior agency practice where the agency did provide an explanation for its different action
  • rejecting argument for remand based on unexplained inconsistency with prior agency practice where the agency did provide an explanation for its different action
  • preservation requirements of ORAP 5.45 “apply not only to appeals of trial court judgments but also to petitions for judicial review of agency action”
  • “In construing an administrative rule, we apply the same analytical framework applicable to the construction of statutes ***”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.