Thomas Ciampa v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court “retained the power to award attorneys’ 4 fees after the notice of appeal from the decision on the merits had been filed”
• complaining that Mr. Johnson would not file motions Mr. Ewalan asked 15 him to file
• holding district court “retained the power to award attorneys’ 4 fees after the notice of appeal from the decision on the merits had been filed”
• “The Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution bars suits in federal court brought by private parties seeking retroactive monetary damages that would be paid from the state treasury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).