Skip to main content
· 6/28/1996

Thomas C. Hopper v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., Thomas C. Hopper v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., Thomas C. Hopper v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

Citations

  • 87 F.3d 983
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 1382
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1531
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15463
  • 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mere speculation is insufficient to support a reasonable inference of discrimination
  • statistics comparing managerial-level employees discharged from other units and excluding other younger managers discharged just prior to the data did not raise a reasonable inference of age discrimination
  • “Although we must give [the plaintiff] the benefit of all reasonable inferences, we may not accord him the benefit of unreasonable inferences.”
  • statistics comparing managerial-level employees discharged from other units and excluding other younger managers discharged just prior to the data did not raise a reasonable inference of age discrimination
  • “Although we must give [plaintiff] the benefit of all reasonable inferences, we may not accord him ‘the benefit of unreasonable inferences.’ A reasonable inference is one ‘which may be drawn without resort to speculation.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Beam, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.