Thomas Burdick, Estate of Perrin v. Burdick v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a magistrate 3 judge’s non-dispositive ruling is clearly erroneous only when the district judge is left with a 4 “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”
• the district judge must affirm the magistrate judge’s decision unless it is definite that a mistake has been committed
• “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if we have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
• “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if we have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
• “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if we have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
• “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if we have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).