· 12/28/2001
Thomas Brewster v. Shasta County, a Public Entity Brad McDannold an Individual D. Compomizzo, an Individual
Citations
- 275 F.3d 803
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13384
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10724
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27287
- 2001 WL 1658775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding “that the sheriff's department, when investigating crime, acts for the county and therefore the county is subject to section 1983 liability”
- finding 22 that the sheriff acts on behalf of the county when administering county policies
- finding the sheriff acts as a final policymaker for the county when 20 investigating crime within it
- “We are not bound by the determinátion of the California Court of Appeal in Peters that sheriffs are state actors. Questions regarding section 1983 liability implicate federal, not state, law ....”
- “The question is whether he is a policymaker on behalf of the state or the county; if he is a policymaker for the state, then the county cannot be liable for his actions.”
- “the California Constitution clearly identifies the sheriff as a county officer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Wardlaw, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.