Skip to main content
· 1/3/2019

Thomas B. Felton v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e rely upon canons of construction only if the language of the statute is ambiguous . . . .”
  • “When the language of a statute is unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete.” (first alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • FBI documents reviewed by the State Department in the course of adjudicating a visa application were exempt from disclosure
  • “[W]hen the language of a statute is unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.