· 1/3/2019
Thomas B. Felton v. State of Florida
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e rely upon canons of construction only if the language of the statute is ambiguous . . . .”
- “When the language of a statute is unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete.” (first alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
- FBI documents reviewed by the State Department in the course of adjudicating a visa application were exempt from disclosure
- “[W]hen the language of a statute is unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.