Skip to main content
· 12/4/1912

Thomas' Admr. v. Eminence Distilling Co.

Citations

  • 151 Ky. 29
  • 151 S.W. 47
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s request that the Court consider prior art when construing the design patent claim, finding that such considerations would best be considered as part of the infringement analysis
  • “As is common . . . the parties propose dramatically different claim constructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.