· 12/4/1912
Thomas' Admr. v. Eminence Distilling Co.
Citations
- 151 Ky. 29
- 151 S.W. 47
- 1912 Ky. LEXIS 755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s request that the Court consider prior art when construing the design patent claim, finding that such considerations would best be considered as part of the infringement analysis
- “As is common . . . the parties propose dramatically different claim constructions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.