Thomas A. Warmus v. Lewis Melahn James Oetting William Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a review of a state court order was unnecessary to assess damages claims centering on conduct occurring before issuance of the state court order, but remanding for a determination of whether a stay was appropriate
• plaintiff’s damages claims were not incidental because they were “his only claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).