Skip to main content
· 1/12/1984

Thomas A. Gardner v. Tec Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 725 F.2d 1338
  • 220 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 777
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Section 103 sets forth the standard, and so “synergism” of a known combination is not required
  • where the court affirmed the invalidity of the dependent claims because the plaintiff did not argue the validity of three dependent claims apart from the validity of the independent claim and the court could not discern an independent basis for validity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Friedman, Rich, Davis, Nichols, Baldwin, Kashiwa, Bennett, Miller, Smith, Nies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.