Thomas A. Carpenter v. The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jury could infer which of the two defendants were acting in which role 7 despite their facial features being obscured where in addition to testimony of an accomplice driver, the State presented DNA evidence and testimony of two store employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).