Thom v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that upon entry of a guilty plea a defendant is not entitled to a bifurcated trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carroll v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 116×
• Ricondo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-30· cited 69×
• Duhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-15· cited 68×
• Ramirez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-11-14· cited 55×
• Mason v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-02· cited 27×
• Saldana v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-01· cited 17×
• Sommer v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-15· cited 14×
• Escobedo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-01· cited 9×
• McKelvey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-20· cited 6×
• Tony Lakeith Daniels v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-12-20
• Juan Andres Guerra v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-31
• Arturo Ramirez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-10-10
• McDonald, Cedric LaSalle v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-12-19
• Eloy Alejandro Davila v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2013-08-30
• Nathan Hodges v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2013-10-30
• Cameron Deon Brown v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-02-25