Skip to main content
· 8/13/2010

Thoip v. WALT DISNEY COMPANY

Citations

  • 736 F. Supp. 2d 689
  • 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1675
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82726
  • 2010 WL 3219349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘A claim of trademark infringement . . . is analyzed under [a] familiar two-prong test . . . [which] looks first to whether the plaintiff’s accordance with the statute, and (4
  • although a consumer “can be expected to examine the shirt, consider alternatives, and even try it on[,]” the purchase of a “relatively inexpensive [t-shirt does] not call for any degree of sophistication”
  • “A descriptive mark is one that describes a product or its qualities, ingredients or characteristics, such as Tasty bread. Descriptive marks tend to be adjectives identifying the special characteristics of an article.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • elaborating on the likelihood of confusion analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shira A. Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.