THOIP v. Walt Disney Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that no reasonable juror could find likelihood of confusion because the marks in question were distinct and there was no evidence of actual confusion or bad faith, despite the remaining Polaroid factors favoring plaintiff
• rejecting a Squirt survey in part because the allegedly infringing product “stood out like a bearded man in a lineup with four clean-shaven men” and therefore participants were pushed to reach a particular outcome (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).