Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that refusal to sign board releases or attend required medical exam is basis for good faith controversion
• observing that Board “properly applied the presumption” analysis when claim “involve[d] mental injury resulting from work-related physical injury”
• discussing waiver of inadequately briefed issues when litigant is pro se
• “[A] pro se litigant who fails to raise an issue below should not be able to raise the issue on appeal absent plain error.”
• examining evidence related to approximately three-month period of TTD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).