Thiokol Corporation v. Department Of Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a proposed amendment to a complaint is futile if the amendment could not withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
• holding that, if a claim would be properly dismissed, amendment to add the claim would be futile
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment “also bars suits for monetary relief against state officials sued in their official capacity.”
• holding that, if a claim would be properly dismissed, amendment to add the claim would be futile (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (recognizing that granting leave to amend should not be allowed if amendment would be futile
• holding a court should deny a motion to amend if the amendment would be futile
• holding a court should deny a motion to amend if the amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).