Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 27 district court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing an action where all claims were 28 subject to arbitration
• holding that the 18 district court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing an action where all of the claims were 19 subject to arbitration
• holding that 12 district court did not err in dismissing claims subject to arbitration and noting that FAA 13 allows but does not require a stay of court proceedings
• holding that district court did not err in 11 || dismissing claims subject to arbitration and noting that FAA allows but does not 12 || require a stay of court proceedings
• indicating that a stay is not mandatory and the court may alternatively dismiss those claims that are subject to arbitration
• indicating that a stay is not mandatory and the court may alternatively dismiss those claims that are subject to arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).