Ninth Circuit· 5/17/2004

Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Citations

368 F.3d 1053
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9547
2004 WL 1088296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the 27 district court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing an action where all claims were 28 subject to arbitration
holding that the 18 district court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing an action where all of the claims were 19 subject to arbitration
holding that 12 district court did not err in dismissing claims subject to arbitration and noting that FAA 13 allows but does not require a stay of court proceedings
holding that district court did not err in 11 || dismissing claims subject to arbitration and noting that FAA allows but does not 12 || require a stay of court proceedings
indicating that a stay is not mandatory and the court may alternatively dismiss those claims that are subject to arbitration
indicating that a stay is not mandatory and the court may alternatively dismiss those claims that are subject to arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Thomas, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.