Thiesen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the jurisdictional requirement of sec. 974.06” is not met when an appellant is no longer “‘in custody under [the] sentence’ for the conviction he wished to attack” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).