Skip to main content
· 1/13/1993

Theuerkauf v. United Vaccines Division of Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.

Citations

  • 821 F. Supp. 1238
  • 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 694
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5436
  • 1993 WL 178719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that allowing plaintiffs to defeat the economic loss doctrine by seeking punitive damages “would swallow the [d]octrine”
  • declining to address, but recognizing as distinct, the issue whether the economic loss doctrine applies under Michigan law to a claim of fraud in the induce ment arising independent of a contract
  • “Allowing plaintiff to defeat the Economic Loss Doctrine by seeking compensation for emotional distress and punitive damages would also swallow the Doctrine.”
  • mink rancher’s tort action against vaccine manufacturer for loss of stock barred by economic loss doctrine
  • tort claim for death of rancher's minks caused by defective vaccine was barred because loss was the natural, foreseeable result of the product 5 defect
  • “[T]he only remedy for claims relating to the performance of the product, such as a claim that the product did not work as it was supposed to work, may be brought under contract law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.