Skip to main content
· 10/7/1987

Therrien v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Citations

  • 670 F. Supp. 1517
  • 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2382
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1572
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is for the trial court to determine, in the first instance, whether the conduct could be regarded as sufficiently atrocious to permit recovery.”
  • “I cannot see how an employee’s claims of implied contract and promissory estoppel could ever be allowed to stand where that employee has signed a statement acknowledging his understanding that his employment was terminable at any time without cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arraj

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.