Theriault v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if the locations of missing monuments can be determined, the “monuments as a matter of law must prevail over the deed’s course and distance calls”
• “The physical disappearance of a monument does not end its use in defining a boundary if its former location can be ascertained”
• location of boundaries and markers on the face of the Earth is a question of fact
• court must ascertain the original location of any monuments used in a deed if it is possible to do so
• “This requirement is in recognition of the fundamental right of a party to a proceeding before an administrative agency to be apprised of the facts relied upon by the agency in reaching its decision and to permit meaningful judicial review of those findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).