Theresa McINNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California, Department of Consumer Affairs, Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a state administrative agency was akin to a federal agency and therefore not a court for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1738 as a matter of federal law
• “The clear teaching of [University of Tennessee v. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788 (1986)] is that in a Title VII action a prior state decision enjoys issue preclusive effect only if rendered or reviewed by a court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).