Theresa Martin v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs claim would require interpretation of the management rights clause of the CBA, and was therefore preempted
• holding that plaintiff's claim would require interpretation of the management rights clause of the CBA, and was therefore preempted
• holding that state-law claims under the MWCA are preempted “not because the collective bargaining agreement is inconsistent with the state claims asserted, but because it may be so and requires interpretation”
• finding it “very doubtful” that preemption of retaliation claims could take place absent a provision requiring courts to interpret CBAs
• finding claim under section 75B preempted because of a potential conflict with the management rights clause of the collective bargaining agreement
• “It is very doubtful whether, without this ... proviso, [Defendant] would have any plausible claim of federal preemption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).