· 6/1/2009
Therapy Products, Inc. v. Bissoon
Citations
- 623 F. Supp. 2d 485
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45861
- 2009 WL 1515678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting summary judgment where party claiming trademark infringement failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the mark acquired secondary meaning
- dismissing plaintiffs dilution claim at summary judgment where plaintiff was unable to establish any evidence of secondary meaning
- granting summary judgment against plaintiff on common law unfair competition claim where plaintiff failed to show “proof of ownership of a protectable mark”
- rejecting an argument that \significant weight\ should be afforded to the PTO's determination to approve a registration for publication, \because the PTO's approval for publication is only a preliminary determination\
- sales figures did not support finding of secondary meaning where plaintiff claimed it made over $4 million from sales of the product but failed to show that these sales figures were linked to a product actually bearing the claimed mark
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denise Cote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.