Skip to main content
· 3/28/2011

Theodore v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 772 F. Supp. 2d 287
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31962
  • 2011 WL 1113372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under claim preclusion, parties cannot “mask [their] argument under a new legal theory” where the claims “ultimately rely on the same factual nucleus” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.