Theodore Stephens v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and Department of Health and Human Services, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restating prior precedent that “it would be appropriate for the [Board] to honor a request for hearing where a petitioner’s allegations raise non-frivolous issues of fact relating to jurisdiction which cannot be re- solved simply on submissions of documentary evidence.”
• allegation that federal administrative law judge required to attend training program was not probative that his impartiality or independence in a particular case had been impaired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).