Skip to main content
· 5/19/1972

Theodore Kornicki v. Calmar Steamship Corporation v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-Party

Citations

  • 460 F.2d 1134
  • 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 130
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9454
  • 1972 A.M.C. 2396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the circumstances of the particular incident in and of themselves can give rise to a ‘reasonable presumption of spontaneity’ of the utterance”
  • Whether a statement falls within the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule lies within the discretion of the trial judge.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Adams, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.