· 5/19/1972
Theodore Kornicki v. Calmar Steamship Corporation v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-Party
Citations
- 460 F.2d 1134
- 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 130
- 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9454
- 1972 A.M.C. 2396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the circumstances of the particular incident in and of themselves can give rise to a ‘reasonable presumption of spontaneity’ of the utterance”
- Whether a statement falls within the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule lies within the discretion of the trial judge.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seitz, Adams, Hunter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.