Theodore Heinemann, I v. Daniel Satterberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion for summary judgment 12 cannot be granted based on a failure to file opposition, regardless of any local rule to the 13 contrary
• holding that a motion for summary judgment 4 cannot be granted based on a failure to file opposition, regardless of any local rule to the 5 contrary
• holding that a 12 motion for summary judgment cannot be granted based on a failure to file opposition, regardless 13 of any local rule to the contrary
• holding that a motion for summary judgment 8 cannot be granted based on a failure to file opposition, regardless of any local rule to the 9 contrary
• holding that a motion for summary judgment 4 || cannot be granted based on a failure to file opposition, regardless of any local rule to the 5 | contrary
• concluding that the district court may properly treat facts as undisputed for purposes of summary judgment when the non-moving party fails to properly support an 3 14-16999 assertion of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).