Skip to main content
· 10/6/1934

Theno v. Cuthbertson

Citations

  • 140 Kan. 233
  • 36 P.2d 79
  • 1934 Kan. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when an attorney represents a corporation, the corporation is the attorney’s client, rather than the shareholders
  • stating that because the plaintiff failed to explain the importance of the proposed “areas of inquiry or the manner in which their foreclosure prejudiced its case,” the plaintiff “failed to prove that the trial court’s time limitation affected its substantial rights”
  • applying a harmless-error analysis to an alleged violation of MRE 408
  • “[T]o the extent that any valid common law claim may happen to find a corollary in the MRPC, the rules of professional conduct do not eliminate or render invalid a fiduciary duty claim.”
  • “A contract must be interpreted according to its plain and ordinary meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnston, Thiele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.