Thelma L. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the ALJ must “make specific and well-articulated findings as to the effect of the combination of impairments” in determining residual functional capacity
• stating that the ALJ must “make specific and well-articulated findings as to the effect of the combination of impairments” in determining residual functional capacity
• reversing and remanding because the ALJ made specific reference to some, but not all the claimant’s physical impairments during the RFC determination.
• “It is established that the ALJ must consider the combined effects of a claimant’s impairments in determining whether she is disabled.”
• “[I]t is the duty of the ALJ to make specific and well-articulated findings as to the effect of the combination of impairments and to decide whether the combined impairments cause the claimant to be disabled.”
• applying harmless error analysis in Social Security case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).