Theise v. Theise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court may not require husband to substitute wife as beneficiary on “key man” policy to “secur[e] post-mortem maintenance payments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Handy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-11-17· cited 88×
• In re Ochs
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-11-27· cited 14×
• Knowles v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-04-04· cited 8×
• Victoria diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp. D/B/A Lincoln Financial Group
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2025-08-08· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cleverly v. Cleverly
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 42×
• Semprebon v. Semprebon
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-07-19· cited 33×
• Kurz v. Kurz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-03-22· cited 29×
• Quesnel v. Quesnel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-24· cited 28×
• Delozier v. Delozier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-02-28· cited 27×
• Bell v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-05-20· cited 24×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-04· cited 17×
• Clapp v. Clapp
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-11-04· cited 15×
• Justis v. Rist
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-09-18· cited 15×
• Narwid v. Narwid
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-21· cited 5×