The Yuma
Citations
- 117 F. 894
- 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112
Syllabus
<p>1. Collision—Vessels Meeting—Steamer and Schooner in Tow.</p> <p>Evidence considered, and heló, to show that a steamer passing up the St. Clair river and a schooner coming down in tow were both in fault for a collision in which the schooner was sunk,—the steamer for sheering to starboard, toward the course of the schooner, after passing the ship having the latter in tow, and in failing to take timely action to keep at a greater distance after the exchange of passing signals, which she might safely have done; and the schooner for the same reason, it appearing that she did not promptly change her course, as did the steamer having her in tow, which was exonerated from fault.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As 20 a condition precedent to imposing sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 37 the Defendants must have violated a Court Order”
- “Pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3), a court may direct [alternative means of] service when 14 facts and circumstances of the present case necessitate the district court's 15 ||intervention.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hazel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.