Third Circuit· 8/26/1924
The West Irmo
Citations
- 1 F.2d 87
- 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1787
- 1924 A.M.C. 1293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- same owner and agent, common control emphasized
- same owner and agent, common control emphasized
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woolley, Davis, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ameejee Valleejee & Sons v. M/V Victoria U.Fourth Circuit· 1981-10-09· cited 33×
- P. T. Perusahaan Pelayaran Samudera Trikora Lloyd v. SalzachtalE.D. New York· 1974-02-25· cited 25×
- Compagnia Maritima La Empresa, S.A. v. Rod PickardFifth Circuit· 1963-07-10· cited 16×
- The M. Vivian PierceD. Massachusetts· 1931-03-24· cited 8×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1981-10-09· cited 3×
- The American StarThird Circuit· 1926-03-01· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spice v. United StatesD. Maryland· 1922-02-10· cited 24×
- Struthers & Dixon, Inc. v. Green Star S. S. Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1923-07-03· cited 18×
- City of CamdenS.D. Alabama· 1906-07-25· cited 16×
- GydaD. Maine· 1916-07-31· cited 16×
- The CimbriaD. New Jersey· 1914-05-12· cited 13×
- The PuritanD. Massachusetts· 1919-06-11· cited 12×
- The J. C. WilliamsS.D. New York· 1883-01-15· cited 10×
- Mudgett v. The RaleighS.D. New York· 1887-10-26· cited 10×
- China Mut. Ins. v. WardSecond Circuit· 1894-02-09· cited 8×
- The CentaubusD. Maryland· 1922-08-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.