The Wackenhut Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is difficult to distinguish the ballot here found to be ambiguous from those found to be unambiguous by the Fifth Circuit in the cases cited above. The Board in its brief appears to be splitting hairs.\
• “It is difficult to distinguish the ballot here found to be ambiguous from those found to be unambiguous by the Fifth Circuit in the cases cited above. The Board in its brief appears to be splitting hairs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).