The W. C. Kirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that counsel’s inadvertence to update a pleading “is not enough to establish substantial justification”
• “If one party lists a potential witness on its Rule 26 disclosures, the other parties . . . can then make a calculated decision whether to seek discovery from that person and thereby mitigate the possibility of surprise . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).