The Upjohn Company v. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp.,defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was substantial evidence upon which the jury could find non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents despite the fact that the product was bioequivalent to the patented product
• \We review these grounds for their support of the jury's verdicts of inequitable conduct and unenforceability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).